DISCLOSURE – Page 10

Session 7: The need for online sources for ticket creation

Posted on March 18, 2015
/Under DISCLOSURE

In this new meeting, we continue with the analysis of the case of the women of Andalusia (entrepreneurs of cooperatives) who do not have external references to give relevance. They are made invisible by the media. How to change this? We think about the importance of having media, even if they are not the big ones, with which ties are established and help to give visibility to these women through articles, reports and interviews. When there are no primary references from official institutions or the media, it is very difficult to help a Wikipedia entry be considered relevant.continue reading →

Session 6: The alleged lack of relevance in Wikipedia articles

Posted on March 11, 2015
/Under DISCLOSURE

Article or section with no apparent encyclopedic relevance: the subject matter or wording leads one to believe that it should be deleted. Please add arguments or edit the article, as appropriate, and add references to reliable and independent sources to assess the encyclopedic relevance of the topic. If not, it will be deleted within 30 days of the original date of this notice. Please do not remove it without first consulting with the user who placed it, or with a third user who enjoys the trust of the community - preferably a...continue reading →

Session 5: Experiencing collaborative editing and documentation

Posted on March 4, 2015
/Under DISCLOSURE

In view of the activity scheduled for Saturday, March 7, an editathon on the occasion of International Women's Day, the group set out to do a collaborative editing experiment on a pad to later create the entry on Wikipedia. One of the participants spoke of the importance of a woman jurist, María Telo, and that at the time of raising it had no article in the free encyclopedia (after the various editathons on March 8, someone had already created the entry, so it could not be finished...continue reading →

Session 4: Types of users and difficulties. Feeling of belonging in the collective

Posted on February 25, 2015
/Under DISCLOSURE

To start this fourth session, which was attended by three people (two women and one man) with quite different experiences, I explained the two legs of this working group in terms of analysis: the collective documentation (relating to the world of wikis) and the collaborative editing and creation of content (which is done on pads). Both parties generate difficulties and resistances that, as I saw in this meeting, are also related to affective elements and belonging to a community. > Wikipedia, difficulties and classes of users For these people...continue reading →